So basically he's talking about movies that are at first praised, but over time gain more and more distractors. Sometimes the groups of distractors are small, but sometimes they get very large, to the point of no longer being praised at all. This is something I've been wondering about lately. In particular, I don't really understand the backlash that's come down on Forrest Gump in recent years, to the point that when anyone talks about it, it's to criticize it. While it's not nearly one of my favorite movies, it certainly isn't a bad movie.
I notice he talks about the backlash that came down on the Blair Witch Project when that movie moved into larger release, and yet neglects to mention that the exact same thing is happening now to Paranormal Activity. I've heard people I know describe Paranormal Activity as "stupid" and little else, while critics were praising it as the scariest movie in recent years. I think it has a lot to do with the same issues that befell Blair Witch; wider audiences aren't really the target audience, and Paranormal Activity probably wasn't what they were expecting it to be. Well, these same people I know also praised the hell out of Transformers 2 (going so far as to say it should win an Oscar. I hope they were just joking, because if not, I know some really stupid people. )
Speaking of Berardinelli, his upcoming reviews lists tomorrow's as Twilight: New Moon. Why is he even bothering to review that? He's already made his views on the series quite plain (down to its basic concept.) Is he expecting to be surprised by this new entry? Probably not.
