That article has FO's review linked at the bottom, and apparently has had it for some time...


On a side note, is it just me, or does it seem like for mathematics, Wikipedia might not be too bad, and in fact is starting to rival mathworld? Wikipedia is more likely to have explanations, instead of just results, and the explanations seem more geared to general readers (eg., Lagrange's motivation for the Euler-Maclaurin sum formula)