Won't happen, for a million reasons.

Including, but not limited to

-I would be limited to reviewing games that I could get screen shots for. This rules out games for many systems (Dreamcast, for example). I wouldn't want to "steal" screen shots from other sites.

- Some games are emulated poorly and screen shots are inaccurate.

- I like to use the Lynx browser. It is text based. No need for images. It would be good to have my site work optimally for as many browsers as possible, and I seriously consider Lynx among them.

- Is the logic behind screen shots to give readers an idea of what the game looks like? Why is that more important than what the game sounds like (though some have midis in their reviews) or plays like, or any other number of things which cannot be directly shown? I'd rather have my words describe the game. My opinion is, if someone wants direct experience after reading my review, he or she should play the game.

- My review format does not have a place to put screen shots (though granted I could just toss a few at the end. Peppering them throughout would be unthinkable for me) I will not change my format for the benefit of screen shots.

- Personally, I just really don't care too much one way or the other about screen shots.

- I guess I can't deny that there's some lazyiness on my part here. Though I don't really care about having a really "html-y" site, if I would, I don't even know how I would want it to look. I don't feel like going through the bother of coming up with the design - especially since I just like the text look - especially especially since I got the text looking relatively good, as it no longer goes from screen edge to screen edge.

- I don't have a computer to get, or edit, screen shots easily - if at all. This renders just about all of the above moot.