I don't think anything needs to be cut. But there are some things that seem unnecessary.

Quote:
I hear there's a Samurai I missed on my only play through the game who's supposed to lethal. I never had the interest to play through the game again, so I wouldn't know if that's true or not.


It seems like even you're not very interested in this, so I'm not sure why I (as a reader) should be, either. You could probably cut this.

Quote:
Speaking of Dark Dragon, think about the name. "Dark Dragon". That doesn't even sound evil to me. It doesn't even sound like a name. Seriously, I think I'd be pretty embarrassed if I were supposed to be the physical form of all evil and I somehow landed a name that sounds like something out of Mega Man. Of course, I'd be pretty embarrassed if my name were "Dark Force", too. That's why I go by his Phantasy Star name of "Darkfalz". Funny how altering a few letters changes the name from sounding like a common noun to pure evil. Shame Sega didn't do that with Dark Dragon. And if a horrible name wasn't enough, he doesn't even look like a dragon. Now... Dragonlord. THAT was evil in the form of a dragon. THIS is not. You could have done better, Sega.


As a review reader, I assume that if more time is spent on a topic, the more important it must be to the reviewer's opinion. Now, I can understand why the name "Dark Dragon" is lame, but I really doubt it's a dominant reason behind your dislike of the game. So, maybe I'd cut that, and try to work a more subtle way of saying you dislike the name into your review, like It seems that he's on a mission to "revive" (last I checked, the intro said he wasn't dead) the evil Dark Dragon (a lame, uninspired name for a supposedly evil creature).
I LOOOOOOVE Flying Omelette!!
Crawl and 1000