The very definition of supernatural--meaning outside of nature--dictates that natural evidence will not support it. The only concept in logic that gives
evidence to the existence of anything supernatural is the concept of a point of origin. If the universe or time is finite in any way, a point of origin must
exist for it. For matter to be brought into existence from inexistence demands that natural law be contradicted. I know that current studies into dark matter
seek to answer these questions as well, and from an empirical standpoint, I'm not writing that off as possibility. However, with these acknowledged open
questions, there is room for the concept of existence outside of natural law in a legitimate belief structure.
I'm gathering, though, that by "creationists" the general definition is something more along the lines of the modern American militant moral majority types rather than people who have religious beliefs in the supernatural.
I'm gathering, though, that by "creationists" the general definition is something more along the lines of the modern American militant moral majority types rather than people who have religious beliefs in the supernatural.
Got Shnoo?
