Quote:
That's the GI Joe Law where if someone acts like a total jackass towards you, you can't just blow them off or say "shut the fuck up" or something like that back to them because that would be "lowering yourself to their level" which makes you "as bad as them".
Hey, if someone has broadened their mind, and is trying to be respectful of all people, that's one thing.
This isn't that, though. For one thing, it's not just for people. You're supposed to defend inanimate objects as well.
And it's not presented as a moral issue (and even if it was, a wise person wouldn't be trying to force their morality off on others). They're acting like it's some sort of LOGICAL CONTRADICTION to treat any two vaguely similar things slightly differently.
The real thought behind this seems to be, You're supposed to defend things. I guess they, in their groping, struggling way, see it as some type of intellectual honesty.
Hey, every (for example) videogame system has some good points, so if someone complains about one, you're supposed to step up and point out those good points.
But I have never said I should defend every thing. I have never said that all viewpoints are equally valid. In fact, I've always said the opposite -- that some things are better than others.
So there's no contradiction for me to treat things differently -- I've been saying that from the beginning.












--"For my king and piracy!!!" --




