<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Did Ebert finally lose it or what?</title>
        <link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/8015/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ From the current front page:













 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:39:32 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:08:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/105064/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-105064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not only did Berardinelli not give any four star ratings last year, but we&#39;re half way through this year and still no four stars.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/105064</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:08:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/104248/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-104248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The &quot;top critics&quot; rating at Rottentomatoes is 10% for that movie.  For comparison, Catwoman got an 11% top critic rating.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/104248</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/104239/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-104239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, he wasn&#39;t the only critic that liked it and he didn&#39;t give it four stars or even 3-1/2. His review could probably have lived without those lines
that suggest the only reason people wouldn&#39;t like it is because there&#39;s not enough action in it, though.
<br>
<br>
It might also be worth noting that the two critics I read the most often, James Berardinelli and Qwipster, both gave it negative reviews.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flying Omelette)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/104239</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:56:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/104219/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-104219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If it was just a fluke movie he happened to like and the rest of his scores seemed rational it would be one thing. But as things are, I think it&#39;s so funny
that Ebert gave <a title="The Happening" target="_blank" href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10007985-happening/">The Happening</a> 3 stars.
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/104219</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/100228/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-100228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  [T]he [Oscar] winner was that piece of crap, &quot;No Country for Old Men, the story of a guy with a bad haircut chasing a guy with a mustache for 140
  minutes, that leads to no ending at all. 
</blockquote>  Reading positive reviews of that movie leaves me with a feeling of &quot;What&#39;s the point?&quot;  Ebert&#39;s goes on and on about how
perfect it is, but I didn&#39;t pick up on anything tangible.  I imagine the acting and directing might be good, but what good does... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/100228</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/97977/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-97977</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ebert mentioned this:
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  It was a time of wonders, an autumn of miracles, one of the best years in recent movie history. One great film after another opened, and movie lovers found
  there were two or three, sometimes more, must-see films opening on a weekend. I gave up rationing my four-star ratings and went with the flow.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
It&#39;s like the videogame reviewers&#39; excuse for giving that so many high scores:  There REALLY ARE that many... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/97977</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/97961/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-97961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What&#39;s great is you can now ask, &quot;I wonder <span style="font-style: italic;">how many</span> four star reviews Ebert wrote this week?&quot;
<br>
<br>
This week it was two, but I don&#39;t think it&#39;s been zero since his health improved. 
<br>
<br>
Berardinelli, on the other hand, has 10 days left in the year, and still no four star score awarded.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/97961</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:24:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94927/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You&#39;ll also notice that they got rid of the &quot;Ebert Recommends&quot; panel, and replaced it with &quot;Now Playing&quot;.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94927</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 06:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94804/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For comparison with another reviewer, Berardinelli gave four stars to...
<br>
<br>
-ZERO moves so far this year
<br>
-2 movies in 2006
<br>
-1 movie in 2005
<br>
-1 movie in 2004
<br>
-5 movies in 2003
<br>
-2 movies in 2002
<br>
-4 movies in 2001
<br>
-2 movies in 2000
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94804</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:00:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94450/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Absolutely. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Amagons brother)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94450</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94444/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Stephen King once called out movie reviewers for giving too many four star ratings.  He said the reviewer should ask himself before giving four stars, &quot;Is
this movie really as good as The Godfather?&quot;
<br>
<br>
Ebert&#39;s response was, &quot;If I applied that standard to giving out four stars, then it might be months or years between when I could give that
score.&quot;
<br>
<br>
Yes, that&#39;s exactly the point! 
<br>
<br>
If you really like a movie, but it&#39;s not up to that... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94444</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94443/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think it&#39;s interesting that the &quot;New Reviews&quot; section is empty. Maybe they didn&#39;t want to have all those 4-star ratings right on top of one
another in one little section, but it&#39;s probably just a glitch.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94443</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94429/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html#reply-94429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, I&#39;ve been saying that he has for some time. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flying Omelette)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94429</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Did Ebert finally lose it or what? ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/8015/t/Did-Ebert-finally-lose-it-or-what-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ From the current front page:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert1.JPG" alt="image">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert2.JPG" alt="image">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert3.JPG" alt="image">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert4.JPG" alt="image">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert5.JPG" alt="image">
<br>
<img src="http://www.cb007.com/ebert6.JPG" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/8015</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:39:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>