<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB</title>
        <link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/7859/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ They have 30 days to change the game and resubmit, but it sounds like they want to fight to have it changed to M the way it is.

It must be pretty gruesome stuff since it sounds like it&#39;s for violence, not sex.


Story
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:28:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/97496/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-97496</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/newsArt.cfm?artid=14964">http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/newsArt.cfm?artid=14964</a>
<br>
<br>
Manhunt 2 was completely banned in the UK, but Rockstar successfully appealed.
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  <p>Rockstar has won its fight to overturn the BBFC&#39;s decision to refuse Manhunt 2 classification.</p>The Video Appeals Committee voted four to three in
  Rockstar&#39;s favour, leaving the BBFC to either classify the game... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/97496</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94397/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-94397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Or how about if Dark Lord was ripping off the Mana Clan&#39;s....
<br>
nah, let&#39;s not go there. <img src="http://www.flyingomelette.com/ezboard/emoticons/emotdog.gif">
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94397</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94366/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-94366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What if you were ripping off their chestburster penises with pliers? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Captain Ladd Spencer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94366</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/94340/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-94340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Tragedy!
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  But there have been some unfortunate content omissions, too. When we first wrote about Manhunt 2, we referenced a particularly nasty death sequence, in which
  Danny could use a pair of pliers to literally rip the testicles off a hunter. That murder has been completed removed from the updated build of the game. Not
  a big deal for us, as it only amounts to one kill out of dozens.
</blockquote>
<br>
I think this game might actually be a little too violent... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/94340</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/92090/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-92090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m just apathetic about the whole thing.  I&#39;m not shocked by Rockstar, I&#39;m not interested in playing a videogame just because it&#39;s
&quot;shocking&quot;, I&#39;m not interested in debating this issue in terms of free speech, I don&#39;t care what effect this controversy has on
Rockstar&#39;s business.  It&#39;s just boring to me.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/92090</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/92060/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-92060</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ And yet the video game industry would probably be so much better off without them...
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bomberguy221)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/92060</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/92048/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-92048</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What&#39;s funny is I can&#39;t see anything that&#39;s more offensive, graphic, mature, or what have you in Manhunt 2 than what is in the original Manhunt. I
mean, Manhunt had scenes of stabbing people&#39;s&#39; eyes out with glass shards, bashing in heads with bats, point blank gunshots to the face, jamming
crowbars into people&#39;s brains, trussed women getting executed...every other word was &quot;fuck&quot; in the first half...I think, in true rockstar
fashion, this is a publicity... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Facilitypro)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/92048</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:47:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91757/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We&#39;re protecting them from becoming seven year olds yelling &quot;You got my fucking burger wrong!&quot; at McDonalds. And doing a bang-up job at it.
<br>
<br>
I think the most important lesson we&#39;ve collectively learned so far is that if kids hear or see something, they will immediately become curious about it.
Parents who avoid the issue altogether tend to make things worse, because now the kids learn something to twist Mommy and Daddy&#39;s arm with. It&#39;s the
attraction of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bomberguy221)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91757</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:20:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91733/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91733</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>And that was in long shot.
<br>
<br>
I thought I heard there was some technical rule, like one use of &quot;fuck&quot; gets you a PG13, while two is an automatic R. </p>

<p>The older system for movies was probably more appropriate.  I mean, if a movie has one or two profanities, and a kid in the audience doesn&#39;t know what
they mean anyway, then they&#39;re just gonna be another vocabulary word they don&#39;t know the definition of.  And so it just goes over their heads.</p>

<p>When I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91733</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91732/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Airplane was rated PG and had a brief shot of a topless woman. City of Lost Children was rated R and the only reason Crawl and I can figure out that it was is
because it also has a brief shot of a topless woman. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flying Omelette)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91732</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91731/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ &quot;The Break-Up&quot; had it, and that was PG-13.
<br>
<br>
But I was quite surprised at how many movies got a PG rating when I was a kid. When I watch them today, I can&#39;t see them getting that rating anymore.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bomberguy221)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91731</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91728/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Weird thing to me is how movie ratings seem to me to have become actually more restrictive in many cases. Up until the early 1990s, I can think of several PG
movies that featured either nudity or the word &quot;fuck,&quot; yet after about 1992 I can&#39;t think of a single movie with even breasts or &quot;fuck&quot;
in them that weren&#39;t at least an R at that point. For example, Logan&#39;s run had nudity and was a PG, Spaceballs had the word fuck in it and got the same
rating. Look to the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Amagons brother)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91728</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91714/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Another thing people were upset about is that the Wii version of Manhunt 2 would let you act out different kinds of killings with the motion controls.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91714</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91713/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="post-body">
  <div class="scrolling">
    I never said it was &quot;artistically mature&quot; and nor do I think it is, but I don&#39;t believe something really has to be to still be inappropriate.
    One problem is that screaming, &quot;NOOOOOOO!&quot; is just always going to make something seem unintentionally funny now.
    <br>
    <br>
    There is more to the Curtis Blackburn character than just that scene, too. He&#39;s also a pedophile.
  </div>
</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flying Omelette)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91713</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91709/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91709</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, okay, that can be an example of something that might &quot;deserve&quot; an R rating for content, which addresses my first point.  But for my second
point, I still don&#39;t think that scene has artistic maturity.  That first scene, while potentially &quot;disturbing&quot; in terms of content, is actually
kind of ... um ... funny.  The way it is acted just seems silly.
<br>
<br>
And, in general, not just for &quot;disturbing&quot; things, I find that when art tries too hard for an... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91709</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91707/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ We already talked about it IRL, but I&#39;m kind of in agreement that Killer7 is not really appropriate for a younger audience.
<br>
<br>
Mainly for these two scenes WARNING!!! The first one is very disturbing:
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXwWjxbzuIk">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXwWjxbzuIk</a>
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1z1F_e6doNA">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1z1F_e6doNA</a>
<br>
<br>
Maybe I&#39;m just being... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flying Omelette)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91707</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91700/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m of mixed mind about this whole rating system.
<br>
<br>
For the most part, I think it&#39;s stupid and overprotective.  Like Halo being an &quot;M&quot;.  If that game were a movie, there&#39;d be nothing in it to
keep it from getting a PG!!  Maybe -- MAYBE -- a PG13. 
<br>
<br>
But remember that Raiders of the Lost Ark once got a PG and had a face melt, which is far more graphic than anything in Halo.
<br>
<br>
Or what about Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas getting an AO for Hot Coffee?... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Crawl and 1OOO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91700</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91645/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nintendo doesn&#39;t surprise me. Sony, however, kinda does. I would think they might not mind as much, considering San Andreas and God of War were both caught
in the crossfire of Hot Coffee summer and both of those games were on their system. Then again, parent satisfaction might be their main goal at this point,
too. Still, really odd.
<br>
<br>
Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance (for GCN) was rated T. That one is a little more explicit in its characters dying, especially if Ike loses. Some... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bomberguy221)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91645</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91638/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nintendo and Sony have said they will not allow an AO game to be released, banning the game if it doesn&#39;t get changed to M.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91638</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/reply/91594/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html#reply-91594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think Fire Emblem get an E, actually.  It would certainly receive an E+10 today, though.  Super Smash Bros. Melee got a T, though, and was probably one of
the reasons ESRB made the E+10 rating.  It&#39;s really quite tame for a T-rated game.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (MaskedSheik)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/sreply/91594</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Manhunt gets initial AO rating from ESRB ]]></title>
			<link>http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/7859/t/Manhunt-gets-initial-AO-rating-from-ESRB.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They have 30 days to change the game and resubmit, but it sounds like they want to fight to have it changed to M the way it is.
<br>
It must be pretty gruesome stuff since it sounds like it&#39;s for violence, not sex.
<br>
<br>
<a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/6172743.html?om_act=convert&amp;om_clk=newstop&amp;tag=newstop;title;1">Story</a>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CLOUDBOND007)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://flyingomelettespalace.yuku.com/topic/7859</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>